Interests and limits
|
Factors studied |
Positive effects |
Negative effects |
|
| Work organization |
- Fertilization and irrigation can be automated. |
- Reflection and calculations necessary to implement fertilization and irrigation adapted to the cropping system. - Technical support required. |
|
| Economy |
- Reduction of purchases of inputs to the strict quantity necessary for crop needs. |
- Possible purchases of programmers. - Cost of soil analyses. |
|
| Agronomy |
- Some green manures (crucifers, marigolds, rattlesnakes, etc.) have 'disinfectant' properties for the soil. - Improvement of soil structure and stability, stimulation of soil fauna activity with appropriate fertilization. - Better vigor of the plants which better support the possible attacks of bioaggressors. - Adding organic matter to the soil improves the clay-humus complex, limiting the leaching of nutrients: better fertilization efficiency. |
- Some green manures promote the development of diseases and pests and their degradation competes with the needs of the plant (case of nitrogen hunger): lack of knowledge of the precise composition of green manures, of the elements actually available and of their speed of culture availability. |
|
| Product qualities |
- Fewer residues of phytosanitary products. |
||
| Environment |
- Preservation of water quality thanks to less use of herbicides if use of plant cover and localized fertilization. - Avoidance of leaching and pollution if the correct intake doses are respected. |
||
| Energy consumption |
|
- Consumption of fuel for spreading and energy for the operation of the |



